.
Feedback

$100 Million Suit for Newtown Family at Stake in Attorney's Claim to State

A New Haven-based attorney representing the family of a 6-year-old survivor of the Sandy Hook School shooting says the state failed to protect the children from "foreseeable harm."


Claiming that the state failed to protect Sandy Hook Elementary School from "foreseeable harm," a New Haven-based attorney is seeking permission to file a $100 million lawsuit on behalf of a 6-year-old survivor of the Dec. 14 shooting.

The action comes two weeks after 20 children and six educators were gunned down at the school by 20-year-old Adam Lanza, a Newtown resident who police said ultimately turned the gun on himself. Lanza reportedly shot and killed his mother, Nancy, before driving to the nearby school.                      

The attorney, Irving Pinsky, filed the request Thursday with Claims Commissioner J. Paul Vance Jr., according to an article by the Harford Courant.

Because Connecticut has sovereign immunity, the Claims Commissioner must grant permission before the lawsuit could be filed, Pinsky told Patch in a telephone interview Saturday morning.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen here,” he said. "They [claims to the commissioner] generally take a long time."

“There’s plenty of history of them granting permission, but I’m not going to guess out loud what they’re going to do,” he added.

Pinsky is representing a 6-year-old girl identified in the claim as "Jill Doe." The claim says "the state Board of Education, the state Department of Education and the education commissioner failed to take steps to protect the minor children from foreseeable harm," the Courant reports.

It further states that the girl suffered emotional and psychological distress as a result of the things she heard and saw that day.

There are more than 600 students enrolled at Sandy Hook School, which is still closed off as a crime scene while state police continue their investigation. Sandy Hook students will be attending Chalk Hill School in neighboring Monroe for the foreseeable future.

“I’m pretty sure there’s many people who have attorney’s lined up,” Pinsky said.

He is still building evidence for the claim, he said, through interviews with witnesses and looking into any potential prior acts of Adam Lanza. “That’s a big part of figuring what to do with any case,” he noted.

Pinsky, who was born and raised in Connecticut, said he hopes the state and country will take the Newtown tragedy as an opportunity to effect positive change and put in place new measures to protect against future school shootings.

"Society should be on edge," Pinsky said. "Something terrible happened."

He says there seems to be concensus that something needs to be done, but the "ways we do that is what people are arguing about” — whether it's more proactive relations with youngster, gun control, improved mental health treatment or a myriad of other related issues.

"We’ll never have a perfect society in my lifetime," Pinsky said, "but I want to make it better.”

Already, in the days following the shooting, President Barack Obama spoke of the need to do more to protect the country's children during a visit to Newtown. He also appointed Vice President Joe Biden to oversee the policy response to the tragedy.

Recognizing the need for a multi-prong approach and looking to ride the building momentum to effect change, the group Newtown United was formed in the wake of the tragedy. A cross-section of the community, the group has the support of elected officials and is at work refining its mission.

t marz December 29, 2012 at 10:11 pm
that's just ridiculous they lived they should be happy if anyone needs some compensation its the families that lost loved ones that attorney should be ashamed wonder why they all have bad reps
Mary Ann December 30, 2012 at 03:27 am
This attorney is as bad as the woman who tried to scam the public , claiming she was the aunt of a child who was killed. How can anyone stoop so low as to try to make money off of peoples' suffering?
Scott Wheeler December 30, 2012 at 03:32 am
Irving Pinsky should be made to hold a sign on I-91 during rush hour saying " I am a shallow little toad of a human, named human because I am not a man nor will ever be".
Sorry Irving but the state is in the hole so you are trying to get water from a rock anyways dork.
Robert Capelleti December 30, 2012 at 04:52 am
Why blame the attorney? He's representing a client who wants a $100 million. And if any one of you had the opportunity to sue for $100 million, you wouldn't?! Please spare me your nonsense. If this tragedy occurred at a private daycare center, you'd see a class action lawsuit for negligence. Because it's a public school, people are afraid of their property taxes going up. But they don't realize all those medical malpractice suits drive all of our insurance premiums up, too.
We are all guilty of greed. Just look at all the 5,000 square feet houses, $60,000 vehicles, etc. Let's not be hypocrites. At least be honest. Recall President Reagan's famous words: "Greed is good". Show me one Republican who doesn't venerate Ronald Reagan and greed. Show me one!
Irma Duff December 30, 2012 at 11:26 am
So let me get this straight: These people have a child who survived; he will grow up with some trauma ($100 million's worth, I tend to doubt); they are trying to help their community get through this difficult time by draining them of $100 million should they win. Sounds charitable, caring and appreciative to me, don't it?
And obviously Mr. Pinsky sends the legal profession to an all-time new low.
Kurt Peterson December 30, 2012 at 02:00 pm
The quote you've attributed to President Reagan was actually from Michael Douglas in the movie Wall Street. I find it amusing when someone says Republicans are greedy for wanting to keep their hard earned money. Somehow, those accusers ignore their own greed in wanting to take what they have not earned.
Susan C December 30, 2012 at 02:40 pm
The "state failed to protect Sandy Hook Elementary School from "foreseeable harm,""
Are you kidding me? They had a security system, the maniac blew thru the doors, how much more could this school have done? And the "foreseeable harm"? Who in their right minds COULD SEE this coming.....absolutely NO ONE!!!! I'm all for helping the families in this terrible and horrendous tragedy but THIS is ridiculous! Who is going to pay out all this money, the State of Connecticut?
JCR December 30, 2012 at 03:34 pm
This is totally disgusting at a time like this. The family is lucky their child is alive. They should God for that not try and take 100 million from the state. That is plain stupid
James December 30, 2012 at 03:36 pm
Sure, this guy has such high ethical standards. He gives lawyers' a bad name, and if some family out there is trying to make money from this tragedy, without even a loss, they are worse.
I did not read anything hear indicating the ambulance chaser was doing this for free either. It's all about the almighty dollar. Just a another example of how our society is withering away.
Bruce Vagts, Sr. December 30, 2012 at 05:01 pm
This is one of the things wrong in this country !!!
Greed, Breakdown of Family Values and God not be included in all we do. I only item which was considered here is Greed !!! God bless us all...........
Observor December 30, 2012 at 07:31 pm
"Show me one Republican who doesn't venerate Ronald Reagan and greed. Show me one!"
Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Scott Wheeler December 31, 2012 at 03:03 am
No, I would not. I would be thinking I was the luckest person on the face of the earth that my kid was in that room and survived.
Die Hard December 31, 2012 at 01:24 pm
Ask any of the 26 families if they would tather have $100 million or their family member back
Observor December 31, 2012 at 05:32 pm
Actually, Scott, I don't think it says the kid was in one of the classrooms where the shooting took place. Maybe she was, maybe she wasn't, but the State Police have the decency to not question any of the children. This sleazebag Pinsky is going to have to put his client on the witness stand.
I'm with you. If my kid got out of the building alive I wouldn't be trying to cash in.
WhiskeyTangoFoxrot December 31, 2012 at 08:46 pm
Die Hard I applaud your comment. No amount of money is going to bring their loved ones back.
Mike Butler January 20, 2013 at 02:56 pm
Maybe Pinsky is trying to regain the income he lost from 5/1/2003 to 12/15/2006 when his law license was suspended for ethics charges (after previously being reprimanded by the state in 1989). Once a shyster, always a shyster.
http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/06511-ct-irving-pinsky-1449309.html http://www.jud.ct.gov/SGC/Decisions/950215.htm

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Southington Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Shar Mc C June 16, 2013 at 07:43 am
Where in Southington did you see the bear?
JChar June 16, 2013 at 07:28 pm
Marion Avenue on Saturday