Bonding of Turf Project Will Provide Fundraising Options, Potential Savings

Members of the Southington Town Council voted this week to use bonding rather than cash to fund turf installation, saying although cash saves money now the town will seek long-term savings with a fundraising committee instead.

When the Board of Finance unanimously recommended the use of cash to fund the installation of synthetic turf at 's Fontana Field, the goal was to find a way to save taxpayers $25,000 in fees and another $200,000 interest over the next ten years.

The lauded the effort this week, but made a decision not to accept the recommendation. Council members have instead voted to fund the project entirely through bonds – but that doesn’t mean they aren’t looking for a way to save the taxpayers money, possibly even more than could be saved by using cash.

Democrat Dawn Miceli said during the recent council meeting that there have been discussions to form a “fundraising committee,” one designed to help solicit sponsorships and donations to help off-set the costs.

Details of the committee plans weren’t made public, however.

“We are not ready to announce anything just yet, but I can say there is some truth to that and we will be discussing it more at a future meeting,” Council Chairman John Dobbins said.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Southington Town Manager Garry Brumback said during Monday’s council meeting that by using bonds instead of cash, the town will have a 10-year period, or longer, to pay back the money borrowed. The town would certainly be responsible for picking up costs up front, but allowing a committee to seek funding could lead to later costs being paid through volunteer efforts rather than taxpayer money.

Christopher Palmieri, minority leader to the council, said by using bonds instead of cash, it also helps avoid any controversy that may be associated with where the cash came from, specifically a plan that would have used surplus money from the town’s Self Insurance fund.

to fund up to $920,000 in costs for the project using cash, a decision that passed by unanimous vote. Under the plan passed, $310,358 was allocated from the town’s 2011-12 contingency fund, with the remaining funding coming from a surplus in the Self Insurance fund.

The plan stirred controversy in town, angering those who said they “were paying into the system and should be refunded,” .

Leary said the surplus is commonly used for one time expenses and noted that 85 percent of the money paid into the fund comes from taxpayers and the town, not the ratepayers who benefit from the fund. Ratepayers are responsible for the remaining 15 percent and if costs exceed the town’s budget, it would be up to the town to find the difference.

“We had some hesitations and doubts that using insurance money was the right way to do it,” Palmieri said. “By using bonds, that is no longer an issue.”

Make sure to like Southington Patch on Facebook or follow on Twitter for breaking news, daily updates and more!

Philip F August 16, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Well at least some common sense has prevailed in a project that is nonsensical to begin with. Dawn Miceli, perhaps this fund-raising effort can be piggy-backed with the one for Gura Building by the SCCA to share the wealth of committee expertise and the take. Fund-raising will only prove the point that people haven't got the money for all these crackpot projects that get railroaded into action. The Town doesn't need (but now it has) an $1 million turf project nor a $1.2 million arts center. and people will speak their minds either via a referendum (before any damage is done) or their pocketbooks. ... And in the next election I hasten to add.
Pensive August 16, 2012 at 01:08 PM
Both projects sound like mirrors and shadows.
Don MacKenzie August 16, 2012 at 06:11 PM
I Agree with Phil I will not support any of these pet projects. We are cutting back on teaching personal and spending a couple of million on turf and art center.Not the best use of our tax dollars.
Stuart Pitt August 20, 2012 at 05:00 PM
Why dont they just fundraise first like other towns have done? I hear that the new track will only have 6 lanes and that the soccer field will not be regulation size...if this is true scrap this project till we can do it right


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »