The planning stage is nearing completion as the town’s Middle School Building Committee prepares to send plans regarding the renovations of Kennedy Middle School and DePaolo Middle School and while there have been no changes in the past month, things are about to pick up.
“There hasn’t been much change, but we are working feverously to complete the documents that the state needs by the deadline next week,” said Edward Pocock Jr., chairman of the committee. “We have invited all of the town’s elected officials to take part in finalizing the plans that will be sent to the state during a special all-board meeting on Monday.”
For those on the outside looking in, sending the project to the state at this point may seem out of place, but Pocock said it’s necessary to keep the project rolling on a proper timeline.
The town last month began moving forward with a plan that could send the middle school renovation project back to referendum – the first time the town has needed a re-referendum on any project, according to Southington Town Attorney Mark Sciota – after it was determined that costs for the project would exceed the $85 million in bonding approved by voters.
Let Patch save you time. Get local news like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.
Members of the committee have been plagued with challenges since the project first began, – $100,000 to remediate 700 cubic feet of contaminated soil and $21,000 for soil to fill the space with – as well as $9-16 million for remediation of PCBs from the two schools.
There is no cost to install a new tank because the oil tank was previously replaced in 1980 and the school will change to natural gas as part of the renovation, officials confirmed this week.
The costs haven’t changed since November, Pocock said Tuesday, and it is still unknown if the federal Environmental Protection Agency will approve the $9 million remediation.
If not approved, it could threaten to kill the project as a whole, but members of the committee and Jim Twitchell, an environmentalist with Hygenix, Inc., of Stamford, are confident that they will be able to gain approval for the lesser plan, which would permanently and safely lock PCBs within walls that are not being demolished as part of the renovation.
So with no voter approval on the news costs and no approval from the EPA, why is the town moving forward?
Simply put, for effective time management.
Based on the schedule of the bonding committee, the town needs to submit the plans now or risk not receiving approval in time to begin the project in 2013, Pocock said. Furthermore, keeping costs manageable will require moving quickly, he said.
“It’s all part of the plan to get this project done. This is something the town needs to do and it’s only going to get more expensive the longer we wait,” Pocock said.
The committee is confident that – especially after considering it will actually lead to savings for local taxpayers in both the short- and long-term.
Christopher Palmieri, minority leader of the Southington Town Council and member of the committee, said that due to changes in square footage as a result of the elimination of a second teacher’s lounge area and other unnecessary space needs, the town will now receive a 56.07 percent reimbursement, a 3.55 percent increase over when the project was first approved.
Palmieri said the town is also seeing added benefits including an additional 2- or 3-percent reimbursement as a result of the town’s involvement in Project Choice, a program that brings students from Hartford to Southington.
In all, it would lead to savings to the the town and taxpayers totaling $940,000 to $1.8 million due to increases in reimbursement, he said.
Brian Goralski, chairman of the Southington Board of Education, said the first step is getting every board involved and on the same page. It’s a step that the committee will take with the meeting at 5 p.m. Monday in the assembly room at the Southington Municipal Center.
“(Pocock’s decision) to get all town boards together is wise move,” Goralski said. to have everyone on same page before go to state."
Pocock said although the public input phase has long passed, the public is welcome to attend the meeting and get a first-hand look at the plans once they are approved.
Pocock also said that in the end, the fate of the project will ride on those who decided 4-1 to approve the renovations in the first place: the voters.
Make sure to like Southington Patch on Facebook and follow on Twitter for breaking news, daily updates and more!
After what we've seen with the first cart-before-the-horse, I'd say it's just another flim-flam the taxpayers are being asked to swallow. Town officials have one nerve pushing this thing along before knowing the full costs of the project and, with about 10% hanging in the air for just the EPA costs, they do not know the full costs. They are once again exposing the taxpayers to a fiscal catastrophe. Messrs. Brumback, Goralski and Poccock and their flunkies are in such a frenzy to make themselves look like effective, efficient managers that they are forgetting their constituents and that the devil is in the details. They just want to broadcast of another wonderful accomplishment -- while we have to grind out teeth for years to come to pay for another screw up. As a taxpayer and voter, I would vote this down for lack of a conscientious, conservative and diligent job in executing their charter.
When they say you have to submit to the state even before you have federal EPA approval, that's just a matter of fact. When everyone involved tells the town that the EPA has indicated and has given verbal agreement to the modified plan, you move forward or you wait and wait and then people want to know why a project takes 3-4 years. As a side note, the State of CT still has NOT closed out the Plantsville or South End Schools projects because they aren't done reviewing the end details for reimbursement - TWO YEARS after the buildings are done and occupied. As far as the additional $4-$5 million in total project costs? Most of that is due to the PCB removal, but people need to look at what taxpayers will actually pay - $940,000 to $1.8 million LESS because of changes. THANK YOU to the Building Committee for making the architects make changes to reduce extra space. No matter how often people say be conservative, the design people always want to make a grand design. The committee cut almost $10 million. There is NO pork left.