New Britain Ave. Relocation Passes on Split Vote

About a dozen residents speak out against plan mostly with worries about impacted businesses.

In a 4-3 vote, the Town Council approved a plan to relocate New Britain Avenue in an attempt to relieve Unionville traffic. The vote followed a public hearing in which about a dozen residents spoke against the project because of potential damage to businesses and the neighborhood, with only one voice in favor.

The plan will relocate New Britain Avenue down Wall Street to Burnham Avenue, intersecting with Plainville Avenue about where Nina’s Tailor Shop is. Several buildings including two houses, the tailor shop and a rental building, Liquor Square, Airtool Sales & Service and LA Styles Salon will be demolished. The end of the existing New Britain Avenue will be blocked off, cutting down on traffic to businesses there like JW Florist and Edward Motor Service.

“I came to this town five years ago because of the traffic and visibility of New Britain Avenue,” said John Walsh, who owns JW Florist near the end of New Britain Avenue. “You cut that off on me and you’re cutting my throat as far as a business man. A lot of my business is impulse and seeing the plants reminds people… of what I’ve got.”

The Unionville Traffic Committee created, vetted and supported the plan unanimously. But at the hearing, committee member Bernie Erickson said he had changed his mind and couldn’t go forward supporting the plan.

“I had three phone calls tonight… one said ‘this is crazy,’ ‘it won’t work’ and the other person said ‘I don’t have a choice… they’re going to take my house,’” Erickson said.

Town Plan and Zoning Commission Chairman Skip Pogson said the $10 million price tag on the project is too high, with too little return, even if the money comes from state and federal funding.

Charlie Keniston, a council member and chairman of the traffic committee, said the money will be spent somewhere in the state and might as well be spent here, improving the situation for residents.

Both Keniston and John Vibert, a council member and traffic committee spokesman, stressed that doing nothing is detrimental to existing businesses throughout the region.

Council Chairman Mike Clark, at his next to last meeting on the council, said he worried that funding would disappear and the town would be left with a blighted property, as it was with the old Parsons Chevrolet lot on Route 4.

Democrat Mike Demicco requested five minutes to caucus with Vibert before a passing vote, 4-3. Clark, CJ Thomas and Nancy Nickerson voted against the plan.

The project will take between three and five years, Keniston said. A year of that will include the design phase, then the right of way phase when the DOT works out prices with property owners. The actual work will be done probably in two ‘construction cycles.’

During that time the Unionville Traffic Committee will work on a village improvement design to capitalize on the opportunity.

“We’ll be able to carefully consider the best uses of the space in the neighborhood and create what we’d like it to be,” Vibert said. “The improvement plan is about making sure the neighborhood is not left in pieces.”

With the specifics of the DOT’s plan not complete and the design plan not even begun, those affected by the project will have at least a few years to make their plans. The DOT is charged with helping displaced businesses relocate and Farmington Economic Development Coordinator Courtney Hendricson has also offered her help.

Brian Hunter, Jr. November 17, 2011 at 05:06 PM
Traffic is not a problem going up the hill (south), only the major backup coming down the hill (north). Does anyone find it odd that Charlie admits that 177 north is always backed up yet the UNIONVILLE Traffic Committee does not have any plans to alleviate that issue? Unless they redrew the lines I still think that is part of Unionville and should be addressed as part of this plan. Otherwise they need to rename the committee to "Solving Rt 4 traffic for those passing thru Town at the expense of the residents that live South of the River" committee.
Kaitlin Glanzer November 17, 2011 at 05:22 PM
Sorry, that's what I meant - the traffic that's on the hill coming down.
Kaitlin Glanzer November 17, 2011 at 06:04 PM
Here's an update: http://farmington.patch.com/articles/dissenting-traffic-committee-member-steps-down-joins-protest
Kay Hunter November 17, 2011 at 07:50 PM
Thank goodness for Patch where we can all read and express our concerns and opinions about these proposed changes. I did not live in Unionville during the urban renewal of the 60s, but from what I have seen and heard, residents have always regretted that the Old Unionville was torn down and replaced with flat roofed buildings (some of which have since gone away). I hope that Town Council and the Traffic Committee will responsibly re-consider and listen to the reactions of the residents of Unionville who have concerns about the traffic, but also want to preserve the Village.
Sas November 20, 2011 at 01:35 AM
Yes go to the Town of Farmington website and you will will find it.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »