.

Proposed Legislation Would Require Cyclists in Connecticut to Ride Single File

The proposal is currently pending before the legislature's Transportation Committee.

A Senate Republican has proposed a bill that would limit bicyclists from riding side by side on Connecticut roadways.

Sen. Kevin Witkos, R-Canton, has proposed Senate Bill 103, in an effort to make roads safer for both cyclists and motorists. The measure would amend an existing  law that allows two bicyclists to ride abreast on a roadway. Witkos' change would require them to ride single file.

In the weeks following the bill's filing, Patch readers on both sides of the debate engaged in a mostly constructive dialogue with over 200 comments posted about the issue of safety on the roads. Witkos said he also received many comments from his constituents via email regarding his bill. As a result, he revised the original proposal to make the legislation more specific.

"I want to thank the public for your outreach and aiding me in the proposed substitute language," Witkos said in an email to Simsbury Patch.

Let Patch save you time. Get stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

The original Senate Bill 103 reads as follows:

An act requiring bicyclists to ride single file on a public road.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That section 14-286b of the general statutes be amended to require persons riding bicycles on a roadway to ride single file, rather than two abreast as currently allowed, in order to permit motorists to safely pass and yield three feet to the bicyclists as required by law.

The amended bill reads as follows:

CGS Sec. 14-286b. (b) Persons riding bicycles or skating or gliding on in-line skates upon a roadway shall ride, skate, or glide single file when being overtaken by a vehicle. Persons riding two abreast, as provided in this subsection, shall not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, and, on a laned roadway, shall ride within a single lane. The operator of a vehicle must provide a safe distance of not less than three feet when overtaking and passing a person riding a bicycle.

Witkos' has said his main goal in proposing the bill was to clarify the existing state law which states that cyclists can ride two abreast as long as they do not 'impede' traffic and he requested an interpretation from the state's attorney's office about how 'impede' should be interpretated. The office responded by saying the interpretation of 'impede' would depend on the state's attorney handling the case.

"My hope is that the substitute language that I provided to the chairs of the transportation committee will allow everyone who uses the public roads to do so in a safe manner without ambiguity of the law in what 'impeding traffic' means," Witkos said.

"The substitute language still provides for cyclists, skateboarder, in line skaters to operate two abreast on a public highway dropping to single file when being overtaken by a vehicle which must still yield a three foot safe passage," Witkos said.

The transportation committee held a public hearing on the bill this week and now can either revise it additionally or send it along to the legislature for a vote.

Make sure to like Southington Patch on Facebook and follow on Twitter for breaking news, daily updates and more!

Melody T February 15, 2013 at 11:31 AM
I believe from my bicycling days that the law supports a bicycle rider as the driver of any other moving vehicle. This law would fundamentally change their rights. In my town, Southington, as in others, it would be more effective if the police did a more rigorous job enforcing the motor vehicle laws we have (like speeding, talking on cell phones when driving, failure to stop, yield, etc.) than to legislate another law that they won't enforce. [To point of fact, Jeff Brush, how about doing a little inquiry into the amount of cell phone viollations our towns write. For my town, Southington, I see a ton of people gassing on the phone in a given hour but rarely see a citation in the stats you publish. Wonder how Mr. WIlkos town, Canton, ranks?] I think Mr. Wilkos, if he wanted to be productive, ought to legislate out the cell phone and other usesless laws. If we don't enforce them and people don't want them, let's cut out the foolishness. Mr. Wilkos is a fool and so are our legislators and your readers if they think this law will "make the roads safer." HA!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something