.
Feedback

[Updated W/ Video] Video Game Take Back Cancelled: ‘We’ve Accomplished Our Goals’

A local group on Wednesday announced that they will not collect games Saturday, saying they have already accomplished goals of raising awareness and starting discussions and there is no need to push the issue at this time.

When members of SouthingtonSOS announced last week that they would be collecting violent video games in an effort to make the community safe, the goal wasn’t to have games banned or to try and force people to turn in their games. The ultimate goal, members said, was to enhance community awareness and promote discussions among parents and children.


Those goals, members said Wednesday, have been accomplished.

The organization has announced that because of the success the program has seen and the personal accountability shown by residents throughout the community – as well as for respect to those who disagree with the take back program – they will no longer be at the Southington Drive-In to collect games Saturday.

Instead, the group said they feel comfortable allowing parents and children to make the responsible decision for themselves.

“When we convened a week ago, we said if this program were to create a conversation between even one family, one parent and child, than it would be a success,” School Superintendent Joseph V. Erardi Jr. said Wednesday. “It has created dozens and dozens, if not hundreds of conversations. I wouldn’t say we are canceling it. I’d say our goal was achieved.”

Let Patch save you time. Get local news like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Although the direct video game collection on Saturday has been cancelled, that does not mean Southington SOS won’t follow through with promises, said Southington YMCA Executive Director John Myers and Charlie Cocuzza, member of the Southington Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors.

The two men said families are encouraged to keep an open dialogue and, if they determine it would be best to turn in the more violent games, they will be rewarded by the chamber with incentives provided by chamber members.

Cocuzza said the incentive program will begin on Monday and will be available with details through a link on the Southington Chamber of Commerce website.

“It’s a program that will only be available to Southington families,” Cocuzza said. “We will ask what steps they have done and through email, determine the best way to send them a reward. Based on the number of people who have reached out already, we are asking that people refrain from going to the chamber directly.”

The concept for the video game take back was first developed just before the New Year and announced on Jan. 2, when members of SouthingtonSOS spoke publicly to say they hoped the program would lead to a community discussion regarding violence in video games.

They never anticipated just how effective the program’s announcement would be in creating that kind of conversation.

The program received national and even international attention from multiple media outlets, including opening a discussion on whether other communities should be doing the same thing. In a forum discussion on HuffPost Live this week, a combination of bloggers, video game designers and storeowners and a New Haven Board of Education member came together to debate the merits of such a program.

Most of those on the panel said while they appreciate the concept, they were concerned with the thought that it took incentive to get people talking. The group was largely opposed to “rewards” for participation in the program and said personal responsibility is more important.

“At the end of the day, they are your kids. Does someone have to pay you $25 to get you to do something positive for your kids?” asked Paolo Romanucci, Huffington Post blogger.

Sue Saucier, SouthingtonSOS member and director of Southington Youth Services, said although Newtown was not the reason behind the program, it was a motivating factor to go public regarding violence in video games. Studies have shown that overexposure to violence can cause children to show an increase in aggression and violent behavior and creates a desensitization to violence in general.

Saucier said Wednesday that the best way to address this issue is to have open discussions between parents and children regarding the games they play, limiting play time if the games are going to be allowed and considering a return for games that are to violent.

See a complete list of how to talk to your kids in the PDF included above or by clicking the link provided.

In many cases, as shown through an influx of emails that SouthingtonSOS has received, the message was heard and parents are having those conversations, she said.

“It’s been heartwarming to see this occurring on a local level and we are hopeful this is something that will spread beyond Southington and even nationwide. We believe it already has,” said SouthingtonSOS member Victoria Triano.

The challenges will still remain, however, as “gamers” have spoken out against the effort and called it an attack on the arts.

Part of the issue here remains that the gaming industry is still relatively new and game designers are challenged to create products people want while also adhering to social responsibilities, said Massimo Guarini, a video game manufacturer and designer located in Varese, Italy.

Guarini said unlike Hollywood, which is now about 100 years old, video games have only been in existence for several decades and changing technology has drastically changed the landscape. He said violence in games is not going away, however.

“Violence (in video games), per se, if not just a bad thing,” he said. “You cannot ignore violence. People are going to buy the games in any case. Banning a game, if anything, is going to make the games more popular. It will make violent games even more appealing to kids because it’s forbidden.”

Tell Us: What are your thoughts on this type of program? Would you have liked to see it move forward? Did SouthingtonSOS make the right decision to cancel? How should video game violence be addressed? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

Make sure to like Southington Patch on Facebook and follow on Twitter for breaking news, daily updates and more!

Charlie Cocuzza January 9, 2013 at 10:41 pm
One note about the article above. Bloggers on the HuffPost stated that they are "largely opposed" to rewarding the participating in the Video Game Giveback program. What's great about America is everyone can speak freely with their opinion and that should be applauded.
But, I think I need to be clear. The Southington Chamber of Commerce, as part of Southington SOS, wants to promote family oriented activities. The so-called "reward", was to applaud the sometimes courageous steps parents have to take to truly understand what their children are doing. Our rewards are thank you(s), purposely given to those families stepping forward. The monetary value of the reward can only be used at Chamber Member companies that volunteered to contribute and that promote family based activities. We are not blindly handing out money. We are promoting a night of bowling, a day of skiing, a family dinner at a local restaurant. I am hoping the over-analyzing of what SouthingtonSOS has done will calm down and we all can recognize we just want our parents to communicate with their children. The world will be a better place. Thank you, Charlie Cocuzza
Jason Vallee (Editor) January 9, 2013 at 10:58 pm
Thanks for the input Charlie. I think it definitely helps the readers to understand better and see the true purpose of programs like this when active participants such as yourself speak to them directly. Thanks for everything you do for our community.
-Jason
Bonnie Sica January 10, 2013 at 11:25 am
I really admire all the members of the SOS and am friends with almost everyone in the room but I would ask, who said that parents weren't talking to their children about these games? You can't buy the game unless you are seventeen without your parent with you and handing over their drivers lisence to be scanned at most stores. Obvious there must have been discussions that took place or the game wouldn't be purchased. Good intentions by everyone involved but I think the conversation needs to be to parents more than the kids. They can't get them without us. It is harder to buy a violent video game in Southington than buying drugs, alcohol or cigarettes if you are under seventeen. Now that is another conversation that needs to be happening all the time between parents and children.
Nathan L January 10, 2013 at 11:38 am
Jason, Charlie, let's be honest: One can fully doubt that the objectives of this was to start a discussion. It is more likely that the chamber and merchants screwed up with the gift card give-away: The volume of cards that would be given away (anybody in all these organizations ever hear of limiting this to town residents only?! We do this with the town dump so it's nothing new).
So a good thing goes bad (in front of the whole world, I hasten to add) and we try spin control to cover it up. Makes me feel real good about the quality of thought that's gone into the High School playing field, the Municipal Center lease and the Middle School renovation project. Way to go folks!
Jason Himm January 10, 2013 at 02:30 pm
"The challenges will still remain, however, as “gamers” have spoken out against the effort and called it an attack on the arts." - Could this one line be any more offensive? "Gamers" in quotes like it's some sort of underground group of misfits. And it's not just "gamers" calling this an attack on the arts. Trying to make people believe otherwise is downright irresponsible. Who is the target audience here?
Jason Himm January 10, 2013 at 02:35 pm
Another good quote from this article. "Instead, the group said they feel comfortable allowing parents and children to make the responsible decision for themselves." I'm sure parents around the world are relieved that some small group of people in some back woods town in CT are "allowing" them to speak to their children. And that their view is the "responsible decision". This whole story just keeps getting better and better. The arrogance of these people.
Bob Upson January 10, 2013 at 09:21 pm
Charlie, your hearts were in the right place. IMHO, it just wasn't a very good idea. I give full credit for doing _something_ rather than just kvetching about the problems our society faces.
"It's better to light just one candle than to curse the darkness."
Robert Kay January 11, 2013 at 03:07 am
Sounds like they had no money to pay people. No one will turn in a game (particularly a $60 game) for nothing. Maybe a scam by some goons?
Former Resident of Southington January 11, 2013 at 11:50 pm
All who have negatively commented on actions that should be commended have simply proven that you would rather TALK about what should have been done, rather than actually ACT on how you believe situations similar to these or issues with parent/ children communication should be handled. Instead of condemning a community group that is trying to do something to better the community maybe everyone should try to be proactive themselves. That way things would be done to your standards. Then, you would have nothing to complain or blog about and you could spend more time playing your violent video games or with your children (whichever applies).
Mike Leone January 12, 2013 at 01:48 pm
This episode illustrates the lengths that some will go to avoid reality. Evil people do evil things to innocent people. It's the history of mankind. If you wish to avoid that reality you can try to blame video games, certain guns, bullying, mental illness, television, what ever makes you feel smart. In the process you are pointing the finger of blame at normal kids playing games, legal gun owners, harmless people who suffer mental illness and Hollywood producers. None of which will do one bit of good in preventing the next massacre. In a free society we have to accept some level of evil amongst us, otherwise we enslave ourselves but still don’t stop that evil. Once we acknowledge this truth we can take steps to prepare for the inevitable evil flare-ups that will occur. Sorry to point out the obvious.
Charlie Cocuzza January 14, 2013 at 07:34 pm
To those who wish to take advantage of the program SouthingtonSOS and the Southington Chamber of Commerce have created, please visit http://www.southingtoncoc.com. There is a link on the home page that will explain how the program works. Thank you to all who participated.
Charlie Cocuzza
Zubin Doshi January 15, 2013 at 05:46 pm
This program was doomed from the start. Anyone with half a brain knows that violent video games under $5 are in every used video game store. Buy a few of them, turn them in, and profit on every game! Not just video games, but movies and CDs too! I have tons of old ones at my parents'. I could've gone to this event and left in a new car! Stupid is as stupid does.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Southington Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Shar Mc C June 16, 2013 at 07:43 am
Where in Southington did you see the bear?
JChar June 16, 2013 at 07:28 pm
Marion Avenue on Saturday